معرفية التقابل في التعريف والتعريف المغالطي في

باب الفحص في أمر دمنة

Abstract

analysis to show the relationships, patterns, geometry and methodologies of these speeches, in cognitive approaches supported by linguistic, rhetorical and critical effort .
In a closer reading of the "door of examination in the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the "Man", in the book of Ibn al-Maqqaf ("Kalila and Damna"), the mechanisms of the pilgrims required by the judicial place are clearly organized, and imposed by the judicial context upon which it was built, to highlight the argument: the argument and its opposite in the formulation of a definition that deliberates the sum of values being built from two points of view :
-The prosecutor's starting point: in an explicit and accusatory argument, it turns into a fallacy at the other end.
-The starting point of the accused: in the pilgrims of a defensive maggot, and turns to the explicit at the other end.
Between this and that, definitions are formed with knowledge values in which all methods of language, rhetoric, pilgrims and criticism are organized, finally producing the definition and the fallacy.
Keywords: convergence, knowledge of values, definition, meta-definition, judicial denominator, judicial context